According to the judge’s ruling, Google cannot ban the use of in-app payment methods for three years
Google plans to appeal the verdict and pause the order
Epic’s lawsuit accused Google of monopolizing app access and in-app payments
Oct 7 (Reuters) – A U.S. judge ordered Alphabet’s ruling on Monday (GOOGL.O)opens a new tab Google will overhaul its mobile app business to give Android users more options to download apps and pay for transactions within them, following a jury verdict last year for “Fortnite” maker Epic Games.
The orderopens a new tab by U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco outlined the changes Google must make to open its lucrative app store, Play, to greater competition, including making Android apps available from competing sources.
Donato’s order stated that Google cannot ban the use of in-app payment methods for three years and must allow users to download competing third-party Android app platforms or stores.
The order bans Google from making payments to device makers to pre-install the app store and from sharing Play Store revenue with other app distributors.
Google said in a statement that it will appeal the ruling that led to the order to the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, and that it will ask the US courts to stay Donato’s order pending the appeal.
“While these changes will likely satisfy Epic, they will ultimately create a series of unintended consequences that will harm American consumers, developers and device makers,” Google said.
Epic Chief Executive Tim Sweeney posted on social media platform X on Monday that Donato’s order was “big news” and said its Epic Games Store and other app stores will come to Google Play in 2025.
Sweeney said app developers, store makers and others have three years “to build a vibrant and competitive Android ecosystem with such critical mass that Google can’t stop it.”
The Google logo is seen in the Google home at CES 2024, an annual consumer electronics trade show, in Las Vegas, Nevada, US, January 10, 2024. REUTERS/Steve Marcus/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rightsopens a new tab
Alphabet shares closed 2.5% lower at $164.39 on Monday after the ruling. Donato said Epic and Google should establish a three-person technical committee to implement and monitor the order. Epic and Google each get a choice, and those two members select the third person.
Donato said his order would take effect on November 1, which he said will give Google time to “bring its current agreements and practices into compliance.”
Epic’s lawsuit, filed in 2020, accused Google of monopolizing how consumers access apps on Android devices and pay for in-app transactions.
The Cary, North Carolina-based company convinced a jury in December 2023 that Google unlawfully suppressed competition through its control over app distribution and payments, paving the way for Donato’s injunction.
Google had urged Donato to reject Epic’s proposed reforms, arguing they were expensive, overly restrictive and could harm consumer privacy and security. The judge largely rejected those arguments during a hearing in August.
“You’re going to end up paying something to make the world right again after you’re caught as a monopolist,” he told Google’s lawyers.
In a separate antitrust case in Washington, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled in favor of the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, saying Google illegally monopolized Internet search and spent billions to make it the Internet’s default search engine. become.
Google also began litigation in Virginia federal court in September in a Justice Department lawsuit over its dominance of the advertising technology market.
Google has denied the claims in all three cases.
Sign up here.
Reporting by Mike Scarcella in Washington Editing by David Bario and Matthew Lewis
Our Standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.opens a new tab
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
by 
